Thursday, 17 September 2015

Samsung compares the Galaxy S6 edge to the iPhone 6 in two new ads

It’s been a while since we’ve seen Samsung go the iPhone-bashing route in its ads, but now the Korean company is back at it. A couple of new commercials have been posted to its official YouTube channel, and they both basically compare the Galaxy S6 edge to the iPhone 6.

You can probably imagine which device is better in Samsung’s perspective. Not all 6s are created equal, it appears, as in this case 6 > 6.
First off, we get an ad focused on two distinct features of the Galaxy S6 edge – the fact that it has wireless charging support, and its front-facing camera which can take wide-angle selfies. Needless to say, the iPhone 6 can boast neither of those things.
To top things off, we get an ad that talks about the curved screen of the S6 edge – and, specifically, that edge itself.
So Samsung thinks it’s obvious that if you do the math its offering comes up ahead. Do you agree?

HTC celebrates the UEFA Champions League final with 24ct gold One M9

HTC took the wraps off a One M9 in 24ct gold to celebrate this year’s UEFA Champions League final between FC Barcelona and Juventus. The Taiwanese manufacturer is among the sponsors of the tournament.

In addition to being coated in the precious metal, the limited edition HTC One M9 has the UEFA Champions League logo engraved on its back. Naturally, the names of the two teams that will participate in the big game are also there.
The June 6 date and the location of the game are also gracing the back of the smartphone. Stadium seat number for the two winners (HTC had staged a giveaway that ended last month) of the exclusive smartphone round up the elaborate detailing on its back.
This is not the first time HTC launches a Champions League-themed device. Last year, the manufacturer pulled the same trick with the One (M8), though that one was much more understated.
As you have probably guessed, the gold HTC One M9 does not have a price tag, though we can reasonably expect it to be quite expensive

We test: The Sony Xperia Z3+ touchscreen is amazingly good when wet

All Xperia Z devices are waterproof, but the new Sony Xperia Z3+ goes beyond surviving the elements, its touchscreen is happy to continue working even when wet. Capacitive touchscreens and water are like oil and, well, water – they don’t mix that well.

You’ve probably seen the UI start jerk around when even a single raindrop lands on the screen. Not going to happen with the Xperia Z3+ though, Sony made sure of it.
Most waterproof phones have hardware keys to get around this, but a few keys can only have limited functionality (typically reserved for taking a photo underwater). The Xperia Z3+ can be used straight out of the pool, without having to wipe the screen dry first.
Here’s our very quick demo, comparing the Xperia Z3 and the Xperia Z3+ head on:
It doesn’t take long to see what’s happening. The Z3 screen registers multi-touch events, panning and zooming, or nothing at all. This makes it really frustrating to operate the UI since you’re never quite sure if your finger will press the button you’re aiming for or do something completely unexpected.
We already have a preview of the Xperia Z3+ up online, and we’re planning on bringing you a full review next week. Let us know if there is some aspect you’d like us to test specifically.

Benchmarking Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML with Intel Atom Z3580 SoC and 4GB of RAM

We got our hands on a retail unit of the range-topping version of Asus ZenFone 2 with 4GB of RAM, so we decided to put it through our set of benchmark tests. The smartphone packs a beefier chipset, which aims to compete with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 family.

Asus ZenFone 2 with 4GB of RAM packs an Intel Atom Z3580 SoC with 2.3 GHz quad-core CPU, coupled with PowerVR G6430 GPU. For comparison, Asus ZenFone 2 with 2GB of RAM features Intel Atom Z3560 with 1.8GHz quad-core CPU.
Price-wise, the 4GB ZenFone 2 sits closely to the hordes of Qualcomm Snapdragon 615-equipped mid-rangers. However, the device’s chipset performance puts it in the same league as many flagship devices. Therefore, we’ve lined up an eclectic mix of smartphones for our benchmark comparison.
Geekbench 3 is a benchmark that focuses on raw CPU performance. On this instance, the 4GB ZenFone 2 did considerably better than its 2GB, relative, but still couldn’t quite match the oomph of its high-end octa-core rivals.


GeekBench 3

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 5215
  • Meizu m1 note 3988
  • HTC One M9 3761
  • LG G Flex2 3604
  • LG G4 3509
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 3386
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 2923
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 2922
  • Sony Xperia Z3 2860
  • OnePlus One 2663
  • Oppo R7 2620
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 2451
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 2423
  • LG G3 2370
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 2336
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1468
Antutu 5 adds RAM and storage speed into the mix and is an indication of the overall performance of the device. We found the 4GB ZenFone 2 rubbing shoulders with many of today’s heavy hitters in the Android real. Similarly priced mid-range rivals on the other hand, didn’t even come close to its result.

AnTuTu 5

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 69396
  • HTC One M9 51427
  • LG G4 49295
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 48489
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 48361
  • LG G Flex2 47680
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 45530
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 42301
  • LG G3 42038
  • Sony Xperia Z3 40393
  • Meizu m1 note 39224
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 34491
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 29907
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 21562
The trend continues with the Basemark OS II benchmark. Once again the high-end Asus ZenFone 2 posted a stellar score. As expected, its single and multi-core results came out considerably better than those displayed by the 2GB version.

Basemark OS II

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 1769
  • LG G Flex2 1601
  • HTC One M9 1526
  • LG G3 1327
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 1267
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 1202
  • OnePlus One 1196
  • Sony Xperia Z3 1109
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 1094
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 922
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 843
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 814
  • Meizu m1 note 715
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 600

Basemark OS II (single-core)

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 3497
  • LG G Flex2 2528
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 2426
  • HTC One M9 2401
  • LG G3 2267
  • OnePlus One 2213
  • Sony Xperia Z3 2114
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 1891
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 1853
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 1819
  • Meizu m1 note 1754
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 1651
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1514
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 1462

Basemark OS II (multi-core)

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 16986
  • Meizu m1 note 12848
  • OnePlus One 10234
  • HTC One M9 10128
  • LG G3 9975
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 9827
  • LG G Flex2 9758
  • Sony Xperia Z3 8792
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 7749
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 7399
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 7002
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 6467
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 6172
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 5600
GFXBench puts the device’s GPU to the test. The PowerVR G6430 of the ZenFone 2 beat the scores of last year’s Adreno 330, but could’t quite match the output of the Adreno 430 found in today’s Snapdragon 810-equipped devices.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 59
  • HTC One M9 49
  • LG G Flex2 49
  • LG G4 34.5
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 30
  • OnePlus One 28.3
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 28
  • Sony Xperia Z3 27.7
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 27
  • LG G3 26
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 26
  • Meizu m1 note 15
  • Oppo R7 15
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 14.2
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 14
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 5.3

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)

Higher is better
  • HTC One M9 50
  • LG G Flex2 48
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 38
  • OnePlus One 30
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 30
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 30
  • Sony Xperia Z3 29.3
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 27
  • LG G4 24.7
  • LG G3 20
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 17
  • Meizu m1 note 16
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 15.1
  • Oppo R7 14.8
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 14
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 9.6

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 24
  • HTC One M9 23
  • LG G Flex2 22
  • LG G4 14.9
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 13
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 13
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 13
  • OnePlus One 12.1
  • Sony Xperia Z3 12
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 12
  • LG G3 11
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 6.2
  • Meizu m1 note 5.8
  • Oppo R7 5.7
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 5.7
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1.8

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better
  • HTC One M9 24
  • LG G Flex2 22
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 14
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 13
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 13
  • OnePlus One 12.9
  • Sony Xperia Z3 12.7
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 12
  • LG G4 9.4
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 7.8
  • LG G3 7.7
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 6.2
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 6
  • Oppo R7 5.9
  • Meizu m1 note 5.7
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 3.9
Basemark X paints a similar picture. Once again the 4GB ZenFone 2 came up with a respectable score that’s worthy of a high-end smartphone.

Basemark X

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 27169
  • HTC One M9 19848
  • LG G Flex2 19360
  • LG G4 15090
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 13414
  • OnePlus One 13129
  • Sony Xperia Z3 12637
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 12565
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 12257
  • LG G3 10580
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 9111
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 4953
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 4875
  • Meizu m1 note 4617
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1915
Web browser performance turned out quite good as well. The range-topping ZenFone 2 handily beat its cheaper relative, as well as a number of considerably more expensive rivals.

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better
  • LG G4 4085
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 4154
  • LG G Flex2 4621
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 5057
  • HTC One M9 5500
  • Sony Xperia Z3 6355
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 6360
  • OnePlus One 7008
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 7023
  • LG G3 7632
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 10193
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 11439
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 13462
  • Meizu m1 note 15055
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 18124

BrowserMark 2.1

Higher is better
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 2718
  • LG G Flex2 2086
  • LG G4 1990
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 1853
  • HTC One M9 1681
  • Sony Xperia Z3 1533
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 1486
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 1460
  • LG G3 1453
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 1396
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1344
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 1343
  • OnePlus One 1339
  • Meizu m1 note 536
Overall, the Asus ZenFone 2 delivered mostly impressive performance across the board, leaving many flagship devices behind it on more than one occasion. Considering its $300 price tag unlocked in the United States, we reckon that you will be hard-pressed to find more hardware oomph for the money.
Check out our full review of the Asus ZenFone 2 to find out everything else about the smartphone.

Trade-in a working iPhone 5 and get an iPhone 6 for $1 on contract (Verizon and Sprint)

Best Buy is currently running a trade-in promotion where you can trade in a working iPhone 5 for a gift card which can be used to purchase an iPhone 6 for just $1.

It’s worth mentioning that the offer only applies to the 16GB version of the Apple device, and is for a limited time only – valid till June 20. Also, you need to sign a 2-year agreement with Verizon Wireless or Sprint to take advantage of it.
The offer comes just a week after Apple increased the trade-in value of three iPhone models, including the iPhone 4s, 5, and 5s.

Shown in 60 seconds: the best Samsung Galaxy S6 edge features

Samsung tried to sum up the best features of the Galaxy S6 edge into a 60 second ad. Most of them are enabled by the first dual-curved display – People Edge, Edge Lightning, Night Clock, Information Stream – but also both cameras and Samsung’s charging options.

Here’s the 1 minute crash course into Samsung’s flagship.
You can check out the dedicated landing page for some more videos that go into more detail on the Edge features, the camera, the fast wired and the wireless charging, the design, the screen, there are videos for every inch of the device.
They can be helpful even if you already bought a Samsung Galaxy S6 edge. For example, did you know you can reject an incoming call by putting your finger on the heart rate sensor?

Google outs an online tool to help you choose the right Android smartphone

Google released an online tool to help you choose the right Android smartphone for you. The solution is available via the search giant’s Android homepage.

The entire process features a nice graphical interface and is quite fun. You can select from twelve different criteria that you find important in a smartphone. They include photography, gaming, texting, and web browsing among others.

Each category contains father subcategories to refine your search. After you select at least three categories, you can display search results. More than three criteria can be selected if desired.

An option to select a dedicated carrier in the United States is available, though not necessary. You can further refine your search results by price and size (small medium and large).

You can try out the new Google tool by hitting the source link below. Drop us a line with your impressions in the comments.
Source

One Samsung Galaxy S6 edge Iron Man limited edition sells for $91,635 in China

After a few leaks and some teasing, Samsung made the limited edition Iron Man themed Galaxy S6 edge official back in May. It went on sale last month in the company’s native South Korea, and now it’s also become available in China.

That’s where one person paid a whopping $91,635 for one such smartphone. The individual shelled out that amount following an auction for the unit, which was held by JD.com, one of China’s biggest online retailers. The auction went up to $91,635 after 92,429 bids.
So why would anyone pay that much for a handset, red and Iron Man themed as it may be? Well, it turns out that this particular phone had the serial number 66. And according to some reports, 6 symbolizes good luck in China, whereas 66 means something along the lines of “twice as smooth as good luck alone”.
That’s why this device netted that insane number of bids, and why it eventually sold for that insane amount. And obviously the retailer knew all about the number symbolism at play, otherwise it wouldn’t have organized an auction for the S6 edge.

Oppo R1x battery life test

The Oppo R1x stunner of a smartphone was at our headquarters for a detailed review recently. We praised the 5-incher for its design and although it failed to impress with raw performance, it posted respectable scores in the battery department.

It’s exactly battery life we’re going to focus on now, with the complete rundown now following.
The Oppo R1x comes with a 2,420mAh battery capacity, which is a decent number in the midrange for devices with a 5-inch 720p screen. Main rival Sony Xperia M4 Aqua packs marginally less juice at 2,400mAh, and the cell inside the Samsung Galaxy A5 is rated at 2,300mAh.
Talk times were the least impressive area in the R1x’ battery performance, and the smartphone only managed about 12 and a half hours when connected to a 3G network. The Xperia M4 Aqua did better at nearly 16 hours, while the Galaxy A5 was miles ahead at 18 hours.

Talk time

  • Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 LTE 46:44h
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo 13:20h
  • Samsung I9190 Galaxy S4 mini 13:10h
  • HTC Desire 616 dual sim 13:00h
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand I9082 12:45h
  • LG Optimus GJ E975W 12:39h
  • Oppo R1x 12:33h
  • Xiaomi Redmi 2 12:33h
  • Motorola DROID RAZR M 12:31h
  • HTC First 12:31h
  • Sony Xperia M 12:31h
  • Huawei Ascend P1 12:30h
  • Pantech Burst 4:46h
Its in our web browsing routine, where the R1x scored more points. A result upwards of 9 hours means you can surf an entire work shift and still have some leftover battery for a call or two on the way back. In all fairness though, both the Xperia M4 Aqua and Galaxy A5 last upwards of 11 and half hours in this test.

Web time

  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G 16:41h
  • Samsung Galaxy Note Edge 9:20h
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 LTE 9:16h
  • Motorola RAZR MAXX 9:12h
  • HTC Desire 820 dual sim 9:10h
  • HTC Desire 820 9:10h
  • Oppo R1x 9:10h
  • Samsung Galaxy K zoom 9:10h
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 Active 9:05h
  • Apple iPhone 5c 9:05h
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 9:05h
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus 9:05h
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250 3:01h
The video playback result was just a smidge over the 9-hour mark, and the similar longevity to the web browsing test indicates that it’s the display that has the main say on the matter, not the processing or software optimization. It also means that you can safely rely on the R1x to entertain you on your daily commute, or even much longer trips. The Xperia M4 Aqua and the Galaxy A5 have nothing on the R1x this time, both their scores are in the same 9-hour ballpark.

Video time

  • LG G Flex 19:57h
  • Oppo Find 7a 9:19h
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 9:18h
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 Duos 9:18h
  • Nokia Lumia 1320 9:17h
  • HTC Butterfly S 9:03h
  • Oppo R1x 9:02h
  • Sony Xperia E 9:00h
  • Motorola DROID RAZR M 9:00h
  • Sony Xperia E4 9:00h
  • Samsung Ativ Odyssey I930 8:59h
  • Microsoft Lumia 532 8:51h
  • Nokia Lumia 710 3:27h
The R1x didn’t do too well in terms of standby times, which hurt its overall result. Still, the 56-hour endurance rating is a good achievement, and if you use the phone for surfing the web or watching videos, you won’t be affected so badly by the high standby power drawe.

Our battery testing procedure is described in detail in case you want to learn more about it. If you are interested how these results compare to other tested devices, check out our battery life test result table.

Xiaomi Mi 4i battery life test

Xiaomi Mi 4i turned out quite an interesting smartphone, a worthy alternate of the original Mi 4. The new Mi 4i model changes the design, keeps the 5″ screen and 13MP great camera, but comes running on the Snapdragon 615 chip. There is a beefy 3,120 mAh battery, which should keep the Mi 4i up for days.

The MIUI v.6, just like before, offers Performance and Balanced power modes. The Performance mode allows the phone to use all processor cores, while the Balanced limits the CPU usage in order to save battery. Throughout our tests – call, video, browser and standby we used the Balanced mode, as any MIUI users will do most of the time. We tried switching to Performance and re-test the device, but we noticed just minor differences in the results.
The Xiaomi Mi 4i did very impressive on the 3G talk time test, where it outed an admirable 21 hours endurance.

Talk time

  • Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 LTE 46:44h
  • Yota YotaPhone 2 22:09h
  • Samsung ATIV SE 22:05h
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 21:41h
  • Samsung Galaxy Note Edge 21:39h
  • Motorola RAZR MAXX 21:18h
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 21:02h
  • LG Optimus G Pro E985 20:45h
  • HTC One M9 20:44h
  • Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 20:42h
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX 20:24h
  • Motorola RAZR i XT890 20:07h
  • Pantech Burst 4:46h
The MIUI web browser has been improved and not it didn’t crash once during our battery test, plus we saw noticeable performance boost. Xiaomi Mi 4i lasted almost 8 and a half hours on our web script, far from impressive, but good nevertheless.

Web browsing

  • Huawei Ascend Mate2 4G 16:41h
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100 8:48h
  • BlackBerry Q10 8:42h
  • Motorola Moto E Dual SIM 8:42h
  • Motorola Moto E 8:42h
  • Sony Xperia M2 Aqua 8:38h
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 8:27h
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha 8:25h
  • Asus PadFone 2 8:20h
  • Nokia Lumia 735 8:20h
  • Nokia Lumia 810 8:20h
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200 8:17h
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250 3:01h
Xiaomi Mi 4i offered very capable integrated video player and its playback endurance turned out equally good. The phone’s battery dropped down to 10% a few minutes after the 10 hour mark.

Video playback

  • LG G Flex 19:57h
  • Apple iPhone 5s 10:31h
  • HTC Butterfly 2 10:26h
  • LG G2 mini 10:23h
  • Nokia Lumia 735 10:20h
  • Apple iPhone 5 10:12h
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 10:11h
  • HTC One (M8) 10:11h
  • Samsung Galaxy K zoom 10:08h
  • Samsung ATIV SE 10:07h
  • Sony Xperia M2 10:04h
  • HTC First 10:03h
  • Nokia Lumia 710 3:27h
Finally, we’ve tested the single-SIM and dual-SIM stand-by performance of the Mi 4i. If using one SIM card, the Mi 4i ran out of juice in 9 days and few hours. When packed with two active SIM cards the Mi 4i’s battery went dead in 7 and a half days.
So, in our battery test the Xiaomi Mi 4i scored a 64h rating, which means you can count on a little over two and a half days if you do an hour each of calling, browsing and video playback a day. Opting for using the device with just one SIM card active, you can squeeze a little more out of the battery. The single-SIM endurance rating is 67 hours.

Our proprietary test also measures the battery draw in standby, which is not featured in the scorecard but is calculated in the overall rating.
The battery testing procedure is described in detail in case you’re interested in the nitty-gritties.

Motorola’s Moto G (2nd Gen) can be bought for just $139.99 for a few more hours

As part of its daily deals, Amazon is now offering the second generation Moto G for just $139.99, unlocked and SIM-free. This is the cheapest it’s ever been in the US, with its normal price being $179.99.

So you’ll only save $40, true, but at this price level that’s quite much percentage-wise. You have to act quick, though, as the deal will only remain live for around 12 more hours.
The 2014 edition of the Moto G was officially unveiled last September, and it comes with slightly improved specs compared to its predecessor, while still retailing for a very affordable price. It’s got a 5-inch 720p touchscreen, an 8 MP rear camera with LED flash, a 2 MP selfie snapper, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset with a 1.2 GHz quad-core Cortex-A7 CPU, 1GB of RAM, 8GB of expandable storage, and a 2,070 mAh battery. It runs Android Lollipop.

Xiaomi Mi Note Bamboo Edition gets a price cut

went official in January and hit the shelves soon after. Three months later Xiaomi introduced a Natural Bamboo Edition with a rear panel made out of bamboo.

The regular edition of the Mi Note is priced at CNY 1,999 (€290), while the Bamboo Edition was more expensive at CNY 2,299 (€330). Well, this is no more – Xiaomi decided to lower the price of the Natural Bamboo Edition now.
As of today the 16GB model of the Bamboo Mi Note costs as much as the regular one – CNY 1,999. Unfortunately if you like the 64GB flavor better – you’ll have to pay CNY 300 on top of that.
Currently the Natural Bamboo Edition of the Mi Note is available only in China and locked to China Unicom. There is no info on whether the price cut is permanent or not, but we guess it might be a good idea to hurry up.

Saygus V Squared features highlighted in a set improvised videos

The Saygus V2, or rather V Squared, is a rare bird of a smartphone. Its designers have focused on a few key areas, which typically ignite wars in the comments section, and delivered on them, at times even more than you could possibly know what to do with.

Only 5 days into the crowd-funding campaign on Indiegogo, the smartphone has already reached its million-dollar goal. Trying not to lose momentum, the team behind the V Squared has uploaded a series of short hands-on videos showcasing the smartphone’s main selling points.
The built-in 64GB of storage not enough for you and you need a microSD card slot for your extensive multimedia collection? Well, here’s two of those slots, each taking cards up to 200GB. Oh, and note the dual SIM slots too, and the 3,100 removable battery.
The fingerprint sensor on the V Squared has an interesting implementation. It sits on the side of the phone, and is of the swipe variety.
If you belong to the selfe-loving crowd, the 13MP front facing camera may tickle your fancy. Aside from boasting the highest pixel count at the moment (yes, a shared record with the already available HTC Desire Eye, and a few others), the front shooter has optical image stabilization. Well, the primary 21MP camera does too, but somehow it doesn’t get a video of its own, go figure.
You can head over to Saygus’ Youtube channel, where non-believers are given proof that the smartphone uses the USB-C interface and has wireless charging capability as well.
We’ll see how the strategy of throwing every feature you can imagine in a single device plays out. Judging by the Indiegogo campaign alone, Saygus might have actually struck gold.

HTC One M9+ preview

The HTC One M9+ is the estranged big brother of the One M9 that grew up in Asia and learned a few new tricks. It is literally bigger, thanks to its 5.2-inch Quad HD display, has a fingerprint sensor, a MediaTek helio X10 processor, and even brings back the Duo Camera sensor from the M8.

The M9+ is only available in select Asian markets where the standard M9 isn’t available, and will be coming to certain parts of Europe later this year. If you were thinking of picking this up over the standard M9 or just stuck with this one option in your region, read on to find out more.

Design

The design of the M9+ is fairly similar to the M9 but with a few notable differences. The main one is the fingerprint sensor on the front, which looks shoehorned between the right stereo speaker (left grille) and the microphone (right grille). Also, on the back is the distinctive Duo Camera making a comeback with its additional depth sensor on top, and the main 21 megapixel camera lens cover is now circular to match the depth sensor.

The rest of the design is identical to the One M9. The front of the phone has those same sizable bezels, especially below the display that makes the phone too tall and hard to use with one hand. On the side are the new sharpened edges that seem too sharp at first but actually help grip the phone unlike the slippery smooth edges on the M8. The right side has the volume control buttons and the power button. The volume control buttons are split into two and the exact same size and shape as the power button, which means it’s not hard to press the wrong button at times. There is also the microSD tray on the right, with the nano SIM card tray being on the left of the phone. On the top is the IR sensor and on the bottom the headphone jack and the typical HTC upside down microUSB port.
Just like the M9, the M9+ comes in two tone color option. The phone you see above had a silver finish on the front and back and gold on the sides. If you don’t fancy the two tone option, you can get it in full gray or full silver. Regardless of the color, the front of the phone has a matte finish while the sides and the back have a brushed finish.
Just like with the M9, and the M8 and M7 before it, the build quality and fit and finish of the M9+ is exemplary. The phone feels built like a rock and almost as heavy as one. It’s not excessively heavy but it might put some people off. The height does make the phone a bit hard to operate with one hand, even though the phone itself isn’t particularly wide.

Display

The One M9+ has a 5.2-inch, 2560 x 1440 resolution IPS LCD. The display is, quite simply, one of the best on the market, with incredible sharpness, beautiful colors, high brightness, and perfect viewing angles. The colors are vivid without being oversaturated and the overall calibration seems close to ideal to the eye. There really are no discernible issues with the display; it’s pretty close to perfect.

Hardware and Software

Unlike the M9, which runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810, the M9+ runs on the 64-bit MediaTek helio X10 MT6795 SoC, with octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 2.2GHz and PowerVR G6200 GPU. There’s also 3GB of RAM and 32GB of internal memory, with about 22GB available to the user. You can expand it up to an additional 2TB with microSD cards. The phone also supports USB OTG devices. In terms of connectivity, the phone supports LTE, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, and NFC.


On the software side, the One M9+ has Sense 7.0 running on top of Android 5.0.2 Lollipop. The UI looks similar to that on the previous version of Sense on the One M8 but there are enough minor UI changes everywhere to make it look fresh. Most importantly, it now has support for themes, so you can tweak the look even further. What’s problematic is that there is no coherence between HTC’s and Google’s design languages. Sense 7.0 looks pretty much nothing like Material Design, which is why it’s jarring to see a popup for something or the other using Material Design every time it appears on screen.

Performance

The MediaTek chipset on the M9+ is quite powerful and makes light work of most applications. Opening and closing apps, scrolling, and multitasking are all accomplished with a fair amount of ease. Gaming performance is acceptable but you can tell the chipset is not powerful enough to run heavy 3D games at QHD resolution perfectly fine, although most casual games run with no issues whatsoever.
The multimedia performance is good, too. The phone supports most audio/video codecs out of the box. The display is great for watching videos. HTC”s BoomSound speakers aren’t honestly as loud as some people hype them to be but have a richer, more full bodied sound than most phone loudspeakers, and the positioning around the screen helps in creating proper stereo imaging. HTC has also added Dolby surround sound effect, which can be toggled by changing the BoomSound setting from the standard Music mode to Theater, which results in a wider soundstage. You get a more simpler sound enhancement effect with headphones but there’s no need for it as the phone sounds perfectly fine without it and thanks to the built-in headphone amp has one of the loudest outputs around. HTC also provides some great in-ear earphones in the packaging.
The M9+ unfortunately suffers from an overheating problem. In normal usage the phone maintains normal room temperature but fire up a game and the phone gradually reaches an uncomfortable temperature, which spreads easily thanks to the aluminum body. It never gets unbearably hot, even at max display brightness, but it’s still fairly warm and not particularly pleasant to touch.

Fingerprint sensor

The major addition with the M9+ is the fingerprint sensor. Contrary to what you might first think, the sensor is not placed over a physical button, that is, it does not move. Having said that, you can enable an option in the settings that will allow you to tap on the sensor to go to the homescreen, effectively turning into a second Home button that you don’t really need.
What’s cool though about this sensor is that you can place your finger on it even when the display is off and the phone will wake up and then unlock itself, without having to press any of the buttons first as on the iPhone or the Galaxy S6. This makes the unlocking process a bit quicker and easier. This does mean the phone will occasionally wake up or unlock when you’re holding the phone in your hand if your finger touches the sensor, which is why you can disable this feature.
Adding prints to the phone is identical to the way it is on the iPhone or the S6, and you can add up to 5 prints. Other than unlocking the phone, there is nothing else you can do with the sensor as of now but with native support coming in Android M this sensor is going to become a whole lot more useful and a genuine advantage over the standard One M9. Even without that, it’s still far more convenient and faster to simply use the sensor over a pin or pattern lock and infinitely more secure than having no screen lock.

Camera

The One M9+ has the same 21 megapixel Toshiba sensor as the One M9, with the addition of the depth sensor. The image quality of the rear camera is mediocre. The daylight images look good, although detail level is nowhere as good as what 21 megapixels might suggest. The colors are decent but the images are a bit on the warm side. There is also some noise, which is normally hidden but comes out when you start editing the image. In low-light, though, all hell breaks loose. The amount of noise becomes unbearable and is clearly noticeable in indoor shots. You have to try real hard with a dozen filters just to hide the noise in your pictures.


Samsung Galaxy S6 • HTC One M9+
The video recording isn’t great, either. The crop is too tight at 4K since it uses the center portion of the sensor at 1:1 instead of using the entire sensor with pixel binning the way Samsung does. This means all the problems of the still photos are present in the videos, except now slightly worse. The 4K videos don’t even look that great when seen on a 1080p computer monitor.
What makes it worse for both images and videos is the lack of OIS. Low light images often turn out blurry unless you manually stabilize the phone and videos also have a lot of shake in them.
As for the front camera, it’s the same 4 UltraPixel camera from the M9 and the back of the M8. It’s one of the better front facing cameras out there, which is not really saying much.
Lastly, the Duo Camera feature is about as useless this time as it was the last time. It requires you to be at least a foot away from the subject else it won’t work, which, in case of small subjects like flowers, makes them look even smaller. The system still struggles with separating the foreground subject from a busy background subject and the artificial blurring of background still looks iffy. Overall, a complete waste of a feature that should have been dropped on the M9+ as well.
The only good thing about the camera experience is the camera app, which is well laid out and has all the necessary options that make you wish it had a better camera hardware to go with it.

Battery Life

The M9+ has the same 2840mAh non-removable battery as the M9. There is no nice way of saying this but the battery life on the M9+ is atrocious to the point where it seems like a bug. The rate at which the battery meter drops while using the phone is almost hilarious and you could kill the phone from a full charge in about 5-6 hours if you tried. With normal use the phone can last around 8 hours, which again isn’t a lot. The battery drain only happens while using the phone, as it can hold on to a charge quite well in sleep (so you know it’s not Google Play Services that’s killing the battery). Hopefully, this is a bug and there is some solution to the drastic drain in future software updates.

Overall

The One M9+ is a premium phone, even more so than the M9 as the name implies, and it’s priced accordingly. In India, for example, the phone is officially priced at Rs. 52,500 ($827), although you can buy it for around Rs. 48,999 ($772). That puts it well above even the Galaxy S6, which does a lot of things equally well, and some things, such as the camera, a lot better. This puts the One M9+ in a tough spot. There’s a lot to like about it, such as the design, the build quality, the display, the audio quality, and the UI performance. But the mediocre camera, poor battery life, slight heating issue, and the high price makes it hard to recommend to anyone.